<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ed Jones!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloganubis.com/2008/04/25/ed-jones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloganubis.com/2008/04/25/ed-jones/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ed-jones</link>
	<description>Design &#38; Advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:25:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anubis</title>
		<link>http://bloganubis.com/2008/04/25/ed-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>anubis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloganubis.com/?p=761#comment-250</guid>
		<description>They definitely did not steal it; they just borrowed it; and for a good reason…it is a great concept.

But let us not forget that “stealing” or “borrowing” an idea doesn’t give you ownership of that idea; and this is the point - the great concept that deserves to win; is not their “creation” it is their “adaptation”.

Creativity awards merit work based on the originality of the idea and the quality of its execution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They definitely did not steal it; they just borrowed it; and for a good reason…it is a great concept.</p>
<p>But let us not forget that “stealing” or “borrowing” an idea doesn’t give you ownership of that idea; and this is the point &#8211; the great concept that deserves to win; is not their “creation” it is their “adaptation”.</p>
<p>Creativity awards merit work based on the originality of the idea and the quality of its execution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moey</title>
		<link>http://bloganubis.com/2008/04/25/ed-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Moey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloganubis.com/?p=761#comment-245</guid>
		<description>well, they did not steal it. still counts for the saatchi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, they did not steal it. still counts for the saatchi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anubis</title>
		<link>http://bloganubis.com/2008/04/25/ed-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>anubis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloganubis.com/?p=761#comment-244</guid>
		<description>But the question still stands...who should the award go to -The creators of the ad or the adaptors of the ad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the question still stands&#8230;who should the award go to -The creators of the ad or the adaptors of the ad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moey</title>
		<link>http://bloganubis.com/2008/04/25/ed-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Moey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloganubis.com/?p=761#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Well, it is the same agency after all so its a win-win man. the agency knows who came up with who.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it is the same agency after all so its a win-win man. the agency knows who came up with who.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anubis</title>
		<link>http://bloganubis.com/2008/04/25/ed-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>anubis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloganubis.com/?p=761#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Yes it is because it is the “same agency” and the “same client” that made me question why they did not use the original artwork created in Russia?

Is it to charge the “same client” twice for the “same concept”?

Or is it because by using the “original concept” they would have been deprived from entering the Dubai Lynx?

Is the purpose of the Dubai Lynx to award creativity from the MENA region? Or to award adaptations executed by the MENA region?!!

If Dubai Lynx is awarding creativity then the award should go to Saatchi &amp; Saatchi Russia…But they are not in the MENA region.

If Dubai Lynx is awarding mere adaptations of creative concepts then it should not be called a creativity award anymore.

Creative directors nowadays know the rules and regulations so well that they have devised ways to get around them while still looking legitimate. i.e. Tiba frog, PETA and others ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is because it is the “same agency” and the “same client” that made me question why they did not use the original artwork created in Russia?</p>
<p>Is it to charge the “same client” twice for the “same concept”?</p>
<p>Or is it because by using the “original concept” they would have been deprived from entering the Dubai Lynx?</p>
<p>Is the purpose of the Dubai Lynx to award creativity from the MENA region? Or to award adaptations executed by the MENA region?!!</p>
<p>If Dubai Lynx is awarding creativity then the award should go to Saatchi &amp; Saatchi Russia…But they are not in the MENA region.</p>
<p>If Dubai Lynx is awarding mere adaptations of creative concepts then it should not be called a creativity award anymore.</p>
<p>Creative directors nowadays know the rules and regulations so well that they have devised ways to get around them while still looking legitimate. i.e. Tiba frog, PETA and others <img src='http://bloganubis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moey</title>
		<link>http://bloganubis.com/2008/04/25/ed-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Moey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloganubis.com/?p=761#comment-231</guid>
		<description>It is not a copy. worldwide agency, same client, same campaign. same approach.
call all the middle east ads of coca cola copies now.

trashing other agencies doesn&#039;t make your work look better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not a copy. worldwide agency, same client, same campaign. same approach.<br />
call all the middle east ads of coca cola copies now.</p>
<p>trashing other agencies doesn&#8217;t make your work look better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

